Bones & Coloring > Muh Collagen. BONES ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN SKIN!

D

Deleted member 20704

Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Posts
1,484
Reputation
2,342
This is not another long post but a shorter, gentle reminder that no one GIVES A SHIT if an average-boned guy has good skin vs. a GigaChad boned guy with meh skin. So ultimately BONES and COLORING/FEATURES are FAR MORE important than just having good skin, ESPECIALLY if you're under 40 years old. The reality is no one really cares if an unremarkable guy has remarkable skin much. But give a guy with mediocre "collagen" the bones of Maher and watch how shit turns nearly 180 for him if he's at least average height/frame.

Who gives a fuck about some average, boneless bloke in his 30s who has fantastic skin? Now who will take eyes over an insanely angular Chad with meh skin? Chad can get away with a pimple or 2, but a normie with flawless skin isn't halo'd as much as bones with meh skin.

It's apples to oranges ... Skin/"collagen" only matters if you are good looking on all fronts, so it's easily dissable by itself if you've got the bones/coloring working. So really the skin is only important if you're an autist holding on to the last ditch cope for "muh good feature" because skin alone does shit if you're average everywhere else. It's just like how a big frame is useless if you're a midget. Who the fuck cares if a literal midget his GigaChad bones? Well, who the fuck cares if an average, invisible dude just has good skin only? *crickets*

No, you can't look like some old, melting zombie but beyond that a pimple or a few tiny wrinkles are cope + easily fraudable. Can you easily fraud big bones if you're a boneless chicken? No fucking way. Bones > skin. This isn't another autistic "BONES ARE EVERYTHING" but a reminder that bones almost always beat skin alone. Holding your collagen as your last ditch cope doesn't make collagen superior to bones/coloring.

Collagen copers saying "muh collagen is everything" after reading this:

giphy.gif


Enjoy your nice skin, but it ain't getting you much if everything else is shit - meanwhile good bones can hold their own against crappier skin very well.

Want proof? You can easily find out that I am 1,000% correct easily.

How? Put a bonemogger like Maher in some "aging" software & look at the result. Now put some incel with a "glamour" filter & they're still disgusting. You can "age" or find old, bonemogger dudes who're considered handsome despite "no collagen." Meanwhile, subhuman + good skin = still over.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: BrahminBoss, lightskinbengali, Deleted member 7580 and 1 other person
ha
This is not another long post be a shorter, gentle reminder that no one GIVES A SHIT if an average-boned guy has good skin vs. a GigaChad boned guy with meh skin. So ultimately BONES and COLORING/FEATURES are FAR MORE important than just having good skin, ESPECIALLY if you're under 40 years old. The reality is no one really cares if an unremarkable guy has remarkable skin much. But give a guy with mediocre "collagen" the bones of Maher and watch how shit turns nearly 180 for him if he's at least average height/frame.

Who gives a fuck about some average, boneless bloke in his 30s who has fantastic skin? Now who will take eyes over an insanely angular Chad with meh skin? Chad can get away with a pimple or 2, but a normie with flawless skin isn't halo'd as much as bones with meh skin.

It's apples to oranges ... Skin/"collagen" only matters if you are good looking on all fronts, so it's easily dissable by itself if you've got the bones/coloring working. So really the skin is only important if you're an autist holding on to the last ditch cope for "muh good feature" because skin alone does shit if you're average everywhere else. It's just like how a big frame is useless if you're a midget. Who the fuck cares if a literal midget his GigaChad bones? Well, who the fuck cares if an average, invisible dude just has good skin only? *crickets*

No, you can't look like some old, melting zombie but beyond that a pimple or a few tiny wrinkles are cope + easily fraudable. Can you easily fraud big bones if you're a boneless chicken? No fucking way. Bones > skin. This isn't another autistic "BONES ARE EVERYTHING" but a reminder that bones almost always beat skin alone. Holding your collagen as your last ditch cope doesn't make collagen superior to bones/coloring.

Collagencel copers saying "muh collagen is everything" after reading this:

giphy.gif


Enjoy your nice skin, but it ain't getting you much if everything else is shit - meanwhile good bones can hold their own against crappier skin very well.
hair is everything
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deprived and Deleted member 20704
both or nothing


faggot
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: AySab, Deprived, HarrierDuBois and 1 other person
This is not another long post but a shorter, gentle reminder that no one GIVES A SHIT if an average-boned guy has good skin vs. a GigaChad boned guy with meh skin. So ultimately BONES and COLORING/FEATURES are FAR MORE important than just having good skin, ESPECIALLY if you're under 40 years old. The reality is no one really cares if an unremarkable guy has remarkable skin much. But give a guy with mediocre "collagen" the bones of Maher and watch how shit turns nearly 180 for him if he's at least average height/frame.

Who gives a fuck about some average, boneless bloke in his 30s who has fantastic skin? Now who will take eyes over an insanely angular Chad with meh skin? Chad can get away with a pimple or 2, but a normie with flawless skin isn't halo'd as much as bones with meh skin.

It's apples to oranges ... Skin/"collagen" only matters if you are good looking on all fronts, so it's easily dissable by itself if you've got the bones/coloring working. So really the skin is only important if you're an autist holding on to the last ditch cope for "muh good feature" because skin alone does shit if you're average everywhere else. It's just like how a big frame is useless if you're a midget. Who the fuck cares if a literal midget his GigaChad bones? Well, who the fuck cares if an average, invisible dude just has good skin only? *crickets*

No, you can't look like some old, melting zombie but beyond that a pimple or a few tiny wrinkles are cope + easily fraudable. Can you easily fraud big bones if you're a boneless chicken? No fucking way. Bones > skin. This isn't another autistic "BONES ARE EVERYTHING" but a reminder that bones almost always beat skin alone. Holding your collagen as your last ditch cope doesn't make collagen superior to bones/coloring.

Collagen copers saying "muh collagen is everything" after reading this:

giphy.gif


Enjoy your nice skin, but it ain't getting you much if everything else is shit - meanwhile good bones can hold their own against crappier skin very well.

Want proof? You can easily find out that I am 1,000% correct easily.

How? Put a bonemogger like Maher in some "aging" software & look at the result. Now put some incel with a "glamour" filter & they're still disgusting. You can "age" or find old, bonemogger dudes who're considered handsome despite "no collagen." Meanwhile, subhuman + good skin = still over.
Facts
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
This Morning fans' joy as David Gandy returns 21 years on from winning  modelling contest - Mirror Online
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7580
i think those are wrinkles which are looksmin cos its direct age indicator, here pitt has acne scars and it ends up fucking adding to his gruff appeal . its insane what u can get away with as chad, features that are usually looksmin end up being halos

1715289090476
 
  • +1
Reactions: AySab

Similar threads

BWC_virgin
Replies
8
Views
402
halloweed
halloweed
Clavicular
Replies
86
Views
4K
Leqoo
Leqoo
BrahminBoss
Replies
32
Views
2K
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
lestoa
Replies
47
Views
3K
lestoa
lestoa

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top