We make these hyperbolizations to make a point about how these discrepancies exist. If we can agree on the fact that the midget burn victim is at an inherent, nonfixable disadvantage, then you are also conceding that a 5'9 normie is also at a disadvantage compared to the 6'2 chad.
You even admit that you obviously see how you're gaslighting ugly people.
holy fuck go outside you subhuman
So the religion of islam can change the natural law? Cool that you admit to this
Which is of 0 relevance to the discussion, but thanks
ok? i wanted to hear your arguments, not someone else's. tell me what i need to hear in the video and ill watch that segment
im not talking to the psychologist at the moment, and all im doing is providing real and valid arguments to his little theory
I want some logical fucking counter-arguments to what i said in that comment. Or to some kind of explanation on how you arrive to your position beyond what ive already argued against and am currently waiting a response for.
Are you telling me you wouldnt be able to provide any if i asked you for it?
And leaving the basement would do fucking nothing to help you with coming up with a counterargument to everything i said in my last constructive comment, which you ignored. You will still remain out of arguments, poor and homeless.
Why are my troll arguments stumping you so hard? Isn't that a worse look for you and your friend's hypothesis of that "natural law"?
What do you mean? I've seen uglier people in relationships before. Cucked maybe but its still there. You need to know what strategies you must employ.
bluepillers dont disagree with this as ive already said, they disagree with the weight it has on the person's SMV
yeah this view is pretty agreeableblackpiller =
looksmaxxer =
I wouldnt say I have a black pilled philosophy, I treat people the same I always have, I just make sure I put effort in improving my looks because I understand on an intellectual level that it can help a lot in life.
I dont think women are whores for being picky on looks (thats the opposite of being a whore lol), I recognize I as a man have been doing the same thing to them.
The discussion was about men's preferences of which you have no credibility to speak about. I demonstrated to you that men prefer modest women with self-respect over promiscuous sluts and you say that it's irrelevant. Why would I talk to you? You're a joke. You didn't even watch the video. Your paragraphs range from delusional to incoherent and I highly doubt you're even arguing in good faith. Go play with your dildos or something.
Yeah I think the whole hate on casual sex thing isn't because of its moral implications. It's because most men are losers in that arrangement. I guarantee you the chad who's eating good is not complaining about women's lowered bonding capabilities. They can just find the virgin stacy after having their fun in college.
Sure, and blackpillers are saying that this holds so much weight that it is not possible to make a significant enough dent on your SMV using factors that you can control.
Yeah it sounds like this guy watched too much healthygamergg therapy videos and vaush worship compilations.holy fuck go outside you subhuman
Fucking retard, not it wasnt. It was about whether that preference is natural law, which you clearly cant prove.
If I was extremely handsome I wouldn't be here. So looks matter a lot.
you can make a dent relative to the baseline amount of effort you put it. You seriously believe a 5'9 normie basement dweller wouldnt have a better chance by becoming mega extroverted and socially skilled? You literally increase your total reach and potential capture of women interested in you, fact.
Go outside an do what? Only ever encounter people who agree with me on this? That is sure to make me agree more with you guys!
Natural law was just hyperbole. Not sure if you're a literal autist or just interpreting things literally as a bad faith argument. Fact of the matter is that it's impossible for you, me or anyone to conclusively prove how anyone feels about anything. Psychology is not a hard science, but rather a pseudoscience at best. Your worldview is always going to be colored by what you want it be. You're a dirty Jew who wants women to be whores because you think that will undermine Aryan genes and give way for the new world order. That's your personal preference, but it has no bearing on the actual foundations of reality.
Fucking cope. Youre backtracking and lying
yeah because im asian, water
But you haven't demonstrated that. If you're a feminist that's fine, but most masculine men don't hold that standpoint. Culture change as we evolve, but not as fast as you're suggesting. Regardless, I've put forth several arguments as to why men aught to value modesty and faithfulness in women, although I may not have been as comprehensive as I could. So let me lay it out for ya!
You have also claimed to be Greek, curry and mulatto in the past
I think the change is significant, i mean, the fact that it varies so much from culture to culture tells you enough. Id describe what we have now as a halfway point between what it was like in nature and it being completely eliminated.
Sorry this happened to you, but most women arent like this.
It didn't actually happen to me. Lmao I do think I dodged a major bullet once though when my ex proposed that we got married and I declined. She was a hoe who had something like onlyfans.
Brutal, i'd never date a non virgin
no i legitimately hold the beliefs i argued for
You haven't considered the full ramifications of sleeping around on the female psyche, the emotional toll it takes on her and why it makes practical sense for men to discard her. Women become attached to sexual partners more easily than men. It all makes sense if you understand biology. Your brain hasn't developed since the stone age, which Is evident by your own affect, despite a conscious effort not to feel this way.
This would apply to all relationships though, and would be way stronger for LTRS with years of connection.
It's an addiction. Just have a listen to today's pop songs aims towards young women. Taylor Swift and Adelle singing about heartbreak and sluts encouraging women to be sluts (such as WAP). Women always go for Chad and get heartbroken when they realize he only wanted to use them for easy, temporary pleasure. They'll lie to themselves and say that it doesn't affect them, but depression and medication rates say otherwise. Robots are largely undiscovered territory, but I suspect it won't have that effect because it's missing the human element. Maybe in the far distant future when AI robots become indistinguishable from people, but who knows.
Im talking about women who have actual high numbers, theres no way theyre getting fooled over and over again, they know when a ONS will be just that. Why would they keep doing it? If one sexual experience is worth a heartbreak, then that emotional connection was nothing compared to an actual breakup from a LTR. I would never want to experience a breakup just because i get to have sex beforehand, its the worst feeling ever.
Ok, now I know you're trolling. It's been fun talking to you but I can't go on. We obviously have a lot of differing opinions and that's okay. Too bad your wrong though, but you can't always be right about everything. You can be emotionally attached to multiple people, obviously. And having gangbangs doesn't mean you're not engaging in LTRs, so that's a false dichotomy.
Theres no dichotomy, im saying there would be a negative association between gangbangs and LTRs as a proportion of total bodies
Last question - during gangbangs, do women get attached to the guys theyre jerking off as much as to as they do with the other three in in their front hole, back hole and mouth? What if theres a cuck in the corner, if it turns her on and is part of the sex act, is there a level of attachment to him?
I'm sorry, I can't do it mate. I wouldn't know the answer to those questions anyway. I think that's enough internet for today.
Aight ill email Sam Vaknin with these questions then so i can get the answers directly from the expert
Umm akshually that character is 1000 years old
even if its a 12 y/o loli isnt pedophiliaUmm akshually that character is 1000 years old
no proof hes a pedophile
Yes, it is true. The problem is the double standards that women have. Women can demand tall guys, but men cannot judge a woman based on their weight (which is controllable).
Is he a betabux? Is he in an open relationship? Is the woman respecting him in the relationship? Is he getting cheated on?
NTpill of blackpill already talks about this this.
He just mentioned that tall men are struggling because of their personality and proceeds to tell that women dont care about guys having weird personality
Women want men to be emotional about their problems and the problems they can relate to. If you do open up about something they can’t relate to, it will not be perceived as bad luck, but as a weakness and not being able to be good enough to deal with it.
“Believe all women”, laws being skewed against men in divorces, diversity hiring, double standards when it comes to beauty standards, alimony laws, “women are wonderful effect”, etc. BP doesn't believe we require immediate change, some blackpillers do and rightfully so.
Yes, symmetry isn’t everything. There is something called harmony, which means your facial features must go together to look attractive (e.g. Tyler Posey). Harmony is talked about often in this forum. Also, nichemaxxing is a thing (like WW mentioned). Subjectivity exists but objective attractiveness will help you attract the majority of the population, which is very important especially in the current dating market.
Tan isn’t attractive because it shows youre wealthy, it is because tanned skin (with red undertone) will show more definition. Extremely pale skin signals sickness. Light skin with red undertone is the beauty norm in Asia.
